Netflix Analysis Netflix Inc. - 3963 Words

Alexis Allen David Olson Kelsie Peck Joseph Schildhauer Netflix Inc. Introduction: History Netflix was founded by technology enthusiasts and website developers Reed Hastings and Marc Rudolph back in 1997. Netflix originally started with a website to allow orders of DVD’s to be delivered to the home. The goal of the company was to provide a cheap and easy means of delivery of DVD’s to the consumer. As time moved on, Netflix went on to start streaming videos on their own platform and became an emerging power in the video streaming entertainment industry. According to Nasdaq’s website, Netflix became a publically traded company as â€Å"NFLX† on May 23rd, 2002. The IPO was worth $15.00 a share. (1) Now, Netflix (NFLX) according to†¦show more content†¦Ã¢â‚¬Å"But with the number of options expanding quickly, Netflix will need a continuous stream of compelling, exclusive content in order to keep subscribers around.†(4) The video streaming industry is an industry that has appealed to many new entrants such as Time Warner’s HBO, that has a few popular shows that catch viewers attention. Other companies that have been attracted to this industry are Amazon, Sling TV, and CBS All Access. With these options opening up new ways of streaming, it causes Netflix to have to become extremely innovative and create different ways to stay on top in the industry. Overall, Netflix has been extremely successful at being innovative towards the industry through creating their own stream of movies as well as adding movies to their platform. They have made smooth transitions from delivering DVD’s to having their own streaming platform. Though challenges are presented for the company, Netflix thus far has been able to maintain the frontrunner spot on the success curve for the video streaming industry. Strategy Formulation: Vision and Mission Though Netflix does not have an official mission and vision statement, The CEO Reed Hastings came out and expressed both to its customers and investors. Netflix has a mission that influences every decision they make, which is â€Å"Our core strategy is to grow our streaming subscription business domestically and globally. We are continuously improvingShow MoreRelatedNetflix Inc : Marketing Analysis1706 Words   |  7 PagesNetflix Inc: Marketing Analysis By Eugene Simonov Washington Adventist University ECON 528 April 3, 2016 Abstract This paper examines and analyzes the marketing aspect of Netflix Inc. To develop a clear idea of the entertainment industry, this paper explores the background of Netflix Inc. and the present market conditions of its competitors. This paper finds that Netflix Inc. is the fastest growing online entertainment platform in the market. However, due to the nature of the industry it has manyRead MoreAnalysis On Netflix Inc.3736 Words   |  15 PagesDiagnosis paper on Netflix Submitted by Saiful Islam HRM-587 Managing Organizational Change Submitted to Professor Shashon Miles Date: 21st August 2014 Executive Summary Netflix Inc. is providing on demand internet streaming media. The company was found by Marc Randolph and Reed Hastings in 1997 at Scotts Valley, California. The concept of Netflix came through Reed Hastings while he got fined $40 outstanding balance after returning Apollo 13 which was passed the due date. Netflix started withRead MoreAnalysis Of Netflix, Inc. And Its Organizational Vision Essay1303 Words   |  6 Pagesand established Netflix. The business model Reed created focused on customers would receive their movies in the mail and there would never be a late fee (Abraham, 2012 p. 1.8). It was this idea that grew into a new way of watching videos, this paper will conduct a quick SWOT analysis as well as examine the strategy used by Netflix Inc. and its organizational vision. The first step of a SWOT analysis is, understanding what sets Netflix apart from other video rental companies. Netflix had taken the approachRead MoreNetflix : Marketing Analysis And The Market Conditions Of Its Competitors1707 Words   |  7 Pages Netflix: Marketing Analysis By Eugene Simonov Washington Adventist University ECON 528 April 4, 2016 Abstract This paper examines and analyzes the marketing aspect of Netflix Inc. To develop a clear idea of the entertainment industry, this paper explores the background of Netflix Inc. and the present market conditions of its competitors. This paper finds that Netflix Inc. is the fastest growing online entertainment platform in the market. However, due to the nature of the industry itRead MoreNetflix Case Analysis Essay1134 Words   |  5 PagesNetflix, Inc. â€Å"Netflix, Inc. is the worlds largest online movie rental service, with more than 10 million subscribers (Netflix Media Center, 2009).† Netflix exhibits dominant economic characteristics in the online movie rental business. They enjoy strong market size and growth rate when compared to rivalry competition. The number of rivalries are increasing, and the market remains dominated by only a few sizeable rivalries like Blockbuster Video, Wal-Mart, Walt Disney Movies and Movielink’sRead MoreNetflix Organizational Challenge : Netflix Inc. Essay1696 Words   |  7 PagesNetflix Organizational Challenge Introduction In 1997, Blockbuster Video was the dominate force in the home video rental business. Entrepreneur Reed Hastings noted there was a possibility of servicing a larger customer base in the DVD rental market by into expanding into the home rental market. Netflix Inc. made the strategic move to allow subscribed customers to receive movie to their home via the United States Postal service. With this innovative DVD delivery strategy, Netflix was able to surpassRead MoreNetflix Case Study Analysis1179 Words   |  5 PagesGROUP CASE: NETFLIX Group Number: 10 Section: 002 SUMMARY The video streaming industry has problems regarding differentiation, supplier power, buyer power. Netflix has the competitive advantage of providing an extensive collection of movies and TV shows to millions of people all around the world while curating the experience to each customer through its algorithm and customer serviceRead MoreMarketing Plan Netflix1182 Words   |  5 PagesMarketing Plan 1 Situation Analysis Company Background: Netflix, Inc. is the worlds leading DVD rent-by-mail company. The Company was created by Reed Hastings and Marc Randolph in 1997 in Scotts Valley, CA. The idea came to Hastings after he turned in Apollo 13 in late and had to pay $40 in late fees. When Netflix.com originally started business, they started out with only 30 employees and 925 DVD’s for rent. The plan that was originally offered was a seven-day DVD rental for $4, plus $2Read MoreAnalysis Of Netflix : An Internal Analysis Technique1014 Words   |  5 PagesAn internal analysis technique wherein strategists examine customers’ needs, company offerings, and competitors’ offerings to more clearly articulate what their company’s competitive advantage is and how it differs from those of competitors† (Pearce and Robinson, 2013, p. 177). Three circles analysis consists of three circles like the title says where the first circle represents the company’s offerings, second circle represents customers needs and third circle represents the competitors’ offeringsRead MoreNetflix And The Three Circles Analysis897 Words   |  4 PagesNetflix and the Three Circles A three circles analysis is a beneficial way to look at competitor benchmarking that helps provide vision of a company’s comparisons with competitors in the same market, what needs the company provides, what needs the customers want, and what needs the competitor fulfills (Pearce II, J., Rovinson, R., 2015). In using this format to analyse the company Netflix, we are able to see where Netflix has strengths internally and compared to its competitors. The First Circle

The Design Argument The Theory Argument - 1608 Words

The Design Argument In the past hundred years, a great debate has shaken the foundation religious and scientific beliefs of society. Philosophers have been arguing about such a debate for hundreds of years, but there does not seem to be any consensus on whether on the existence of god and the universe. The ancient world never battled over such questions, rather they had accepted the fact that the natural world was created by some being. However, as society made major advancements, the question about god s existence and his creation arose causing many debates and arguments to come about. The design arguments are a popular example of such debates, which is very prevalent amongst philosophers and society at large. â€Å"Simply put, the design argument, or the argument from design, states that the order and purpose manifest in the works of nature indicate that they were designed by an intelligent being† (Velasquez 251). The greatest proponent of the design argument was philosopher William Paley, who formulated the argument. As a student of philosophy and avid proponent of god s existence, I support the design argument and philosopher William Paley. I would like to argue against the beliefs of atheism and agnosticism while supporting the design argument as a means of god s existence. I believe that god is the creator of that which surrounds us and science and nature is a means to prove the existence of god, not rebuttal it. Also I will support the design argument with theShow MoreRelatedThe Theory Of The Design Argument1201 Words   |  5 Pagesmakes of the design argument that are described in this chapter, Hume presents a third. He says that even if the design argument succeeds in showing that a designer made the universe (or the organisms in it), the argument does not succeed in establishing what characteristics that designer has. For this reason, the argument does not show that God exists. Is Hume’s claim correct? How seriously does this undermine the design argument? I think that Hume’s claim that the design argument does not succeedRead MoreDisputes Over the the Design Argument and The Theory of Evolution603 Words   |  2 PagesThe debate between the Design Argument and The Theory of Evolution has garnered endless disputes. The Design Argument, DA, is the argument that a higher entity exists and that he designed all life sources with a purpose in mind. Charles conceived the Theory of Evolution, TE. His theory was not assembled to explain the origin of life; it was to explain the origin of species. The fine-tuning argument is a rebuttal that I will also be discussing thoroughly. The Design Argument attempts to explain thatRead MoreTwo Philosophical Arguments for the Existence of God1460 Words   |  6 Pagesphilosophical arguments for the existence of God. Throughout the course of this essay we shall examine two of the major philosophical arguments for the existence of God. The arguments that we are going to focus on shall be the Design argument and the Ontological argument. We shall compare, evaluate and discuss both the Design (or teleological) argument for the existence of God and the Ontological Argument for the existence of God, as well as highlighting philosophical criticisms of both theories too. ByRead MoreTeleological Arguments Essay849 Words   |  4 Pages The argument from design or the teleological argument points to the existence of order and direction in nature to a kind of purpose. The argument essentially proves the existence of God. A designer must exist because the universe and living things exhibit marks of design in their complexity. Design-type arguments are unproblematic when based upon things nature plainly could not or would not produce, like human artifacts. If designs entail a designer, and the universe shows marks of design, thenRead MoreThe Design Argument For The Existence Of God1286 Words   |  6 PagesONE The design argument for the existence of God follows the model: 1) In nature, things appear to work together for a clear purpose. 2) The best explanation for these relationships is that God designed these things. 3) Therefore, God exists, as he was the one who designed nature. This argument contends that an intelligent designer of the world does exist, and structured the universe so that most natural things fit together for a clear purpose. We can recognize that things in nature seemRead MoreIntelligent Design Versus Aquinas Motion And Causation737 Words   |  3 PagesIntelligent Design versus Aquinas Motion and Causation Intelligent design Theory The theory of intelligent design theory holds that an intelligent cause and not an indirect process best explain the nature of living things and the universal features. The theory appreciates that, for the existence of the universe and the living things in it, there must have been in existence an intelligent force. The theorist are not out to show proof of the intelligent designer or who the intelligent designerRead MoreThe Argument Of God s Existence1737 Words   |  7 Pagesdiscuss arguments in support of God’s existence as well as philosopher H.J McCloskey’s article On Being an Atheist. Within McCloskey’s article he refers to three well known theist arguments as proofs the cosmological, teleological and argument from design. The Cosmological argument is a deductive argument that assumes every fact must have an explanation and comes to the conclusion â€Å"the uncaused cause must be God† (Slick, 2013). On the other hand the teleological as well as the argument from designRead MoreThe Teleological Argument For The Existence Of Intelligent Design1273 Words   |  6 PagesThe teleological argument successfully provides proof for the existence of intelligent design by utilizing intricate scientific data in order to demonstrate intent and purpose in the creation of the universe, as opposed to random and highly improbable occurrences. The purpose of the teleological argument is to present complex details of the universe as evidence that it was designed by an intelligent mind. It suggests that since the universe is so compound and full of fine-tuned intricacies, thereRead MoreDarwinists and Dissenters1535 Words   |  7 Pageswho believe in Darwin’s theory of evolution has been fierce. Each side presents compelling arguments that may sway any uneducated reader to agree with their position based solely on the confidence they portray in their writings. However, because of the vastness and strength of evidence presented by the proponents of modern evolutionary theory, Darwinists have proved their point much greater than those who argue in favor of Intelligent Design. In this essay, four arguments will be presented; two thatRead MoreExamine the Key Features of the Teleological Argument?1491 Words   |  6 PagesExamine the key features of the Teleological argument. The word teleological comes from the Greek word ‘Telos’ which means purpose. The teleological argument is a posteriori and like the cosmological argument, attempts to prove the existence of God. It claims that certain phenomena within the universe appear to display features of design and are perfectly adapted to fulfil their function. Therefore, if features of the universe are so perfectly designed, for example the structure and function of

October Crisis Essay free essay sample

Significance of the October Crisis From the overthrowing of the Russian Tsar to the exile of the Nationalists, the world has been in a state where radical movements have been the main focus of citizens, even in democratic societies. The October Crisis was one of these extraordinary events that had occurred. It was a period of international and national revolutionary movements that used violent acts against constitutional measures. The 1970 October Crisis was a pivotal moment that had an undeniable and lasting impact on Canadians as it revealed the wisdom of Trudeau’s decision to enact the War Measures Act, demonstrated that the FLQ (a left-winged terrorist organization) was not a good representative of the French-Canadians, and it provided evidence that this event, focused on Quebec, is a â€Å"Canadian† issue. One propitious moment that made the October Crisis unforgettable was Trudeau’s wise decision to enable the War Measures Act which showed that Canada does not tolerate terrorism. The October Crisis was triggered by the abduction of government officials in Quebec, by FLQ members in October 1970. The War Measures Act (WMA) was a law that allowed the government to assume emergency powers in the event of â€Å"war, invasion or insurrection, real or apprehended† (Tetley, 2007). Since none of the requirements were present, it had given a stifling argument for all the negative responses that occurred. However, the counterpart of the decision was yet to be told. Canada had previously experienced many terrorist acts by the Front de Liberation du Quebec (FLQ). The group believed the rights and justice of the French-Canadians would only be recognized if Quebec formally separated politically from Canada. Generally, governments cede to the terrorists, exchanging hostages for â€Å"prisoners of words†. If a similar act had commenced in a democratic country, such as Canada, â€Å"giving in to the terrorist(s) would not be an option† (Tetley, 2001). If the Canadian government complied with the kidnappings, the kidnappers would realize that they had a potent weapon to defeat the democratic process. Not only that, but the government would have failed â€Å"to preserve the democratic system† (Tetley, 2007). A democratically elected government is trusted with the task of preserving the rights and freedoms of the society that elected it, which means it does not have permission to abandon its authority and responsibilities to terrorists. Prime Minister Trudeau decided to take drastic measures in ending this atrocity. When the FLQ supporters and political critics called his bluff, Trudeau acted upon his word and revealed his winning hand. The War Measures Act was later approved, which many considered to be the turning point of the crisis. This statute gave limited powers to the government in certain situations, allowing the citizens to realize that their rights were not stripped, and lessened the tension between the Franco- and Anglo-Canadians that prevented public retaliation (Tetley, 2007). The power allowed police squads to arrest and search without warrants, to interrogate detained suspects, and then it continued to build pressure on the FLQ. The Act continued its effect by temporarily ending the Quebec separation hype and gave neutral civilians protection from the armed forces, which strengthened Trudeau’s image as Canada’s saviour (Dann, 2010). While the overall decision for enabling the WMA was the debate of the past, the controversy of today has been the enlightening to the true â€Å"colours† of the FLQ. The October Crisis became a significant event because the whole country was later to become aware of how the FLQ was not a good representative for the Quebecois. The people in the Front de Liberation du Quebec (FLQ) are neither Messiahs nor modern-day Robin Hoods. They are a group who have decided to do everything they can to assure that the Quebecois take their destiny in their own hands, once and for all† (Rioux, 1970), which is what residents of Quebec thought at the time. They agreed with the idea of French-Canadians gaining more control of their lives and becoming their own nation, as they decided to fight for it every day. For some time, many Quebecois had faith in the FLQ, believing the group would speed the process of separation from Canada; however the FLQ’s loyalty to these beliefs is questionable. Ultimately, it was perceived that the FLQ’s only goal was to give Quebec its justice; they wanted to see them united in a free society. On the other hand, during the October Crisis, they had not been able to prove that. When the FLQ kidnapped British diplomat James Cross, it publicized 7 demands, of which only one concerned French-Canadians, pertaining to fairer working conditions which was later dropped (Tetley, 2007). The rest concerned the FLQ themselves: publication of the Manifesto (a public declaration of policy and aims), the name of an informer, $500,000 in gold, the release of 23 jailed terrorists, and to transport them to either Algeria or Cuba (Knowlton, 1990). A goal of Quebec’s at the time, the protection of the French language, was a cause that preoccupied much of the nation, but was not a particular concern for the FLQ. In fact, the 1970 Manifesto was written in and proclaimed in informal French and â€Å"Fringlish† (Knowlton, 1990). The FLQ’s dedication to their cause is doubtful. FLQ believed that they weren’t going to get caught, hence their slogan â€Å"Independence or death† (Brown, 2011). However, when justice prevailed, the members chose exile rather than martyrdom. This made it clear that the FLQ’s dedication did not go as far as risking their lives; instead, they were tried under the Canadian system of justice, which they denigrated but later took advantage of. In addition, none of the FLQ terrorists had lived in Quebec! They were citizens of English descent, who decided to defy the federal government by turning the Quebecois against it (Tetley, 2007). In addition to uncovering the truth regarding the FLQ misleading the Quebecois, the 1970 October Crisis also helped make it clear that the Crisis needed the attention of the federal government. It was opportune that the government revealed its strength during the October Crisis when it intervened in a situation that was not only an issue of concern to Quebec. Opponents of the Federal and Quebec governments had agreed that it was the Quebecois’ entitlement to provide an approach for putting an end to this crisis (Dann, 2010). One reason for this belief was because one of the hostages was a Quebec politician, Pierre Laporte, which reminded Canadians that the FLQ belonged for Quebec, to Quebec and in Quebec. Indeed it was the federal government who, by virtue of its constitutional power over criminal law, adopted the WMA, but in retrospect the provinces also have the authority to request the adoption of the WMA, for the same reasons (Tetley, 2007). The rights, responsibilities, and authority under the Constitution were sometimes divided between the federal and provincial governments and at other times there was joint power and obligation (Dann, 2010). Many people did not believe that the crisis fell under both federal and provincial command. In fact, as the situation got worse for the Quebec government to handle, it was the Premier of Quebec, Robert Bourassa, who sent a letter to Ottawa which privately requested and approved federal help by invoking the WMA (Tetley, 2007). Consequently, many separatists hated this choice, accusing the other provincial governments and federal government for interfering, in which they believed would demonstrate that Quebec and its government was weak and helpless (Knowlton, 1990). Canadians should not forget that the separators were trying to prove a point by demonstrating to the rest of the country that they could overcome obstacles and they deserve their chance to become their own nation. However, the Quebecois agreed that it was typical for the federal authorities to take charge (Brown, 2011). The reason was the security of foreign diplomats (British diplomat James Richard Cross was one of the hostages) in Canada was essentially a federal responsibility. The safety of English residents in Quebec was also a huge factor as they were the targets of many bombings and harassment. Another plausible reason, given by Bourassa, was the ethical reasoning of the government’s decisions (Tetley, 2007). If the federal government did not intervene with this crisis, it would lead victims of this event to question the federal support they were promised and spread the news that the government had done nothing to stop the state of affairs (Knowlton, 1990). Therefore with the federal aide, the Crisis gave the nation’s outsiders a confident feeling that the government know what it was doing, even in a time of distress. The interference of the federal government may have been disliked by both sides, but in the end had proven itself justified and necessary. Trudeau’s decision to enable the War Measures Act, the FLQ having been proven to be not a good choice for representing Quebec, and the necessity of federal intervention are some of the major events that made the October Crisis a crucial moment in Canadian history. In some ways, this event was a true test of how Canadians would react to a national crisis, such as handling a terrorist organization, with only the clear option of force on their minds. In the end, Canada was free of separatist terrorism for many years; the most dedicated advocates of violent revolution in Quebec decided the risks were too great and turned to peaceful methods for advancing their cause. By acknowledging Canada’s example on how to deal with terrorism, many international countries now follow in Canada’s footsteps, recognizing that what once was no more than a colony, an independent and respectable nation after their time of triumph.